Criticize the Cosmological Argument against Atheism Essay

Criticize the Cosmological Argument against Atheism - Essay causaIt is excessively true be bring on science and common sense has confirmed that something cannot come into existence from nothing. The premise also states that the reason why no one has seen something come into existence from nothing is proof that there is a cause for things to come into being (Rutten 45).The first premise has an intuitive appeal. It states that whatever comes into existence has a cause. The cause is what creates something. This agent that the beingness was impelled by a natural inclination. This is true because nothing in this being has ever come into existence out of nothing. This rebuttal tries to prove that there is no existence of paragon and that everything happened from nothing. However, supporters of the first premise argument object this rebuttal. The main response to this rebuttal is through the argument that whole things which have a beginning in their own existence do have a cause. Thi s means that God was not created. Unlike the universe, God did not come into existence. He has always existed even forward the world came into existence (Craig 56).The second premise explains that the world began to exist. This means that the existence of the universe has a beginning. This is back up by the fact that the universe keeps on brandishing and growing. The universe has over the years continued to grow and expand from an enormously dense and extremely hot state (Craig 65). This suggests that the universe started from something and continues to grow. However, the premise can be considered to be false due to one main assumption.The assumption is that its easy to also take into contemplation that the universe, just like the initial cause, has always been in existence and continues to exist. This assumption also puts into consideration that the universe goes through an everlasting cycle of contraction and expansion.A