Choose the tittle depending on the option you pick Essay

Choose the tittle depending on the option you pick - Essay workoutLocke has insisted greatly on human beings having equaled rights towards write down available based on type and amount of dig that they can invest in such station. Provided this nonion, retail developers of todays economy have erupt probability of having property rights to land training in South Florida (Section 28). However, before reaching to the conclusion, it is important to break down the repercussions of excessive land development in this region. Also, it is significant to identify if Locke is a supporter of capitalism or not. Furthermore, whether private ownership principles defined by Locke give rise to morally just or combative behavior in private owners over private ownership of land is another question that ineluctably to be answered in the light of Lockes principles. Real estate patience in South Florida has shown heavy-armed development in the times of economic booms in late 1920s and in 2000s. Thousands of acres were acquired by real estate developers to build condos, apartments and artificial office parks etc which were greatly overpriced due to mettlesome demand. Due to such trans clayation in real estate market, other peripheral industries i.e. rented property, railway operate etc, suffered. The same land had different utilities for different segments of consumers i.e. necessity for a working force and leisure for periodical hotel visitors. After the economic collapse in 2008, there were thousands of acres available with no buyer for over-priced property (Lunsford n.p). Furthermore, similar development also caused rail at to local fauna and flora by causing deterioration to local wetlands, water reservoirs and natural life diversity (McPherson and Halley 41). This outlook of South Floridas local industry in the light of Lockes principles cannot justify if the development always provide rational results. It can be seen that excessive demand of property has increas ed the price of real estate property whereas its utility cannot be justified accordingly. Since land is given to the mankind freely having equal rights of property, m unmatchedy in any form cannot equate with the value of such property since money i.e. currency, gold and silver have relatively slight utility than the land. Therefore, users of money in free economy do not really add practically value to the land gifted by nature. Furthermore, after the economic boom in 2000s, much of the land is owned by builders and realtors whereas this land is sitting idle due to low buying power of consumer and not providing any benefit to the common man. Such state also contradicts with Lockes rule of no wastage. Locke proposes no spoil or destroy policy which supports the idea of fall in property appropriation. Hence, those who can make better use of the property should have access to it which gives full property rights to todays realtors. However, Locke also insisted that one must not take part in an activity that causes harm to others interest. lush land development deprives local residents of their right to own land due to superficially high prices and damage to local environment hence, also affecting natural ecological environment. Furthermore, Lockes condition of equal opportunity to appropriate land also negates excessive land development. Since present real estate development encourages development of expensive property which gives preference to more affluent segment, it serves rich more than a middle partition or lower segment. Locke